ArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArray
BrainModularBrainModular Users Forum2009-07-11T14:13:46+02:00https://www.brainmodular.com/forums/app.php/feed/topic/16482009-07-11T14:13:46+02:002009-07-11T14:13:46+02:00https://www.brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1648&p=9662#p9662 I might also begin working on a 5-band eq filter setup instead of just low and hi, using a few LP filters and this inverse trick.
Statistics: Posted by beatniks3 — 11 Jul 2009, 14:13
]]>2009-07-11T13:36:19+02:002009-07-11T13:36:19+02:00https://www.brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1648&p=9661#p9661Statistics: Posted by 23fx23 — 11 Jul 2009, 13:36
]]>
2009-07-10T23:48:10+02:002009-07-10T23:48:10+02:00https://www.brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1648&p=9659#p9659have to treat the result as stereo+mono, although that is the most common usage.
]]>2009-07-10T20:51:39+02:002009-07-10T20:51:39+02:00https://www.brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1648&p=9657#p9657 just so people can see what it looks like, i took a snapshot of my test design. when the crossfader is 0 you have HP, at 1 you have LP, at .5 you have combo of both.
edit ignore that i have it plugged into audio out R
Statistics: Posted by beatniks3 — 10 Jul 2009, 20:51
]]>2009-07-10T20:47:04+02:002009-07-10T20:47:04+02:00https://www.brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1648&p=9656#p9656interesting job ! will add this one to utils compilation 2...
Statistics: Posted by nay-seven — 10 Jul 2009, 20:47
]]>2009-07-10T18:53:41+02:002009-07-10T18:53:41+02:00https://www.brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1648&p=9655#p9655Statistics: Posted by ethnix73 — 10 Jul 2009, 18:53
]]>2009-07-10T15:26:29+02:002009-07-10T15:26:29+02:00https://www.brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1648&p=9654#p9654"if you take the output from the filter module and subtract it from the unfiltered audio, you get what you want. If the filter is in LP mode, the "original audio - low passed" output will be a high passed version of the audio. If you want to check the result, add the low and high passed and you should get the original. To do a further check, you can substract that audio from the original and get silence."
"In this slightly silly example, you'll hear the original audio. Remove the connection between the filter and the audio out, and you get a high passed version (if the filter is set to LP). If you keep the connection between the filter and audio out, and instead add a connection between -X.out to audio out, you should get total cancellation."
Statistics: Posted by beatniks3 — 10 Jul 2009, 15:26
]]>2009-07-10T02:32:14+02:002009-07-10T02:32:14+02:00https://www.brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1648&p=9642#p9642but with carefully hearing I think we can find the best sample setting, then should remain the same if global setup (block executions/cpu speed don't change... but might worth testing sending a little impulse and count elapsed time, will try, but the couting system might have itself process latency... gonna try.
]]>2009-07-10T01:25:08+02:002009-07-10T01:25:08+02:00https://www.brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1648&p=9641#p9641 do you think it would be possible to measure the amount of samples delay you need and then enter that into num samples? how likely is that number to change?
Statistics: Posted by beatniks3 — 10 Jul 2009, 01:25
dry is going to L1, recomposed to L2 of crossfade. here my source is a sampler to replace.
yes the delay is on the dry before summing the inverted LP. in fact you ll need to separate what goes to L2, one is the LP direct out from LP, the two other wires compose HP.
]]>2009-07-09T23:55:19+02:002009-07-09T23:55:19+02:00https://www.brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1648&p=9639#p9639 so i can just use a delay module on the wire between dry and audio out?
Statistics: Posted by beatniks3 — 09 Jul 2009, 23:55
from first test this seems a way to make a phase inverter, have not total cancelation but quasi, seems to give good results with usine filters.. have to put a delay of a few samples on the dry signal before summing with inverted phase from LP to compensate processing latency (here about 17samples), but results seems good, crossfading between dry and recomposed HPLP gives a quite transparent result (i tried Q at 0,5 crossFreq around 1k)
]]>2009-07-09T23:08:12+02:002009-07-09T23:08:12+02:00https://www.brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1648&p=9637#p9637Statistics: Posted by beatniks3 — 09 Jul 2009, 23:08
]]>2009-07-09T22:34:58+02:002009-07-09T22:34:58+02:00https://www.brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1648&p=9635#p9635think need to find a good 3rd party vst plugin for filter and phase inverter...there might exist some direct crossover as well...im interested too so i ll return results if i find a good setup... but im sure it works, tested on ableton, the phase trick is working.
]]>2009-07-09T22:24:33+02:002009-07-09T22:24:33+02:00https://www.brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1648&p=9634#p9634 that's what i was thinking about why this deley phase invert method isn't working (processing time)
i would try the 1-input or similiar but i'm not sure how to relate phase to either db or 0 to 1, seems like if you did 1- either of those you would dealing with vol.
Statistics: Posted by beatniks3 — 09 Jul 2009, 22:24
]]>2009-07-09T18:56:17+02:002009-07-09T18:56:17+02:00https://www.brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1648&p=9632#p9632Statistics: Posted by beatniks3 — 09 Jul 2009, 18:56
]]>2009-07-09T18:36:31+02:002009-07-09T18:36:31+02:00https://www.brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1648&p=9631#p9631Statistics: Posted by 23fx23 — 09 Jul 2009, 18:36
]]>2009-07-09T15:22:06+02:002009-07-09T15:22:06+02:00https://www.brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1648&p=9622#p9622 here is my progress so far but it doesn't seem to be working, any ideas?
edit i should say i'm just doing the left channel for now just to test
Statistics: Posted by beatniks3 — 09 Jul 2009, 15:22
]]>BrainModularBrainModular Users Forum2009-07-11T14:13:46+02:00https://www.brainmodular.com/forums/app.php/feed/topic/16482009-07-11T14:13:46+02:002009-07-11T14:13:46+02:00https://www.brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1648&p=9662#p9662 I might also begin working on a 5-band eq filter setup instead of just low and hi, using a few LP filters and this inverse trick.
Statistics: Posted by beatniks3 — 11 Jul 2009, 14:13
]]>2009-07-11T13:36:19+02:002009-07-11T13:36:19+02:00https://www.brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1648&p=9661#p9661Statistics: Posted by 23fx23 — 11 Jul 2009, 13:36
]]>2009-07-10T23:48:10+02:002009-07-10T23:48:10+02:00https://www.brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1648&p=9659#p9659have to treat the result as stereo+mono, although that is the most common usage.
]]>2009-07-10T20:51:39+02:002009-07-10T20:51:39+02:00https://www.brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1648&p=9657#p9657 just so people can see what it looks like, i took a snapshot of my test design. when the crossfader is 0 you have HP, at 1 you have LP, at .5 you have combo of both.
edit ignore that i have it plugged into audio out R
Statistics: Posted by beatniks3 — 10 Jul 2009, 20:51
]]>2009-07-10T20:47:04+02:002009-07-10T20:47:04+02:00https://www.brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1648&p=9656#p9656interesting job ! will add this one to utils compilation 2...
Statistics: Posted by nay-seven — 10 Jul 2009, 20:47
]]>2009-07-10T18:53:41+02:002009-07-10T18:53:41+02:00https://www.brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1648&p=9655#p9655Statistics: Posted by ethnix73 — 10 Jul 2009, 18:53
]]>2009-07-10T15:26:29+02:002009-07-10T15:26:29+02:00https://www.brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1648&p=9654#p9654"if you take the output from the filter module and subtract it from the unfiltered audio, you get what you want. If the filter is in LP mode, the "original audio - low passed" output will be a high passed version of the audio. If you want to check the result, add the low and high passed and you should get the original. To do a further check, you can substract that audio from the original and get silence."
"In this slightly silly example, you'll hear the original audio. Remove the connection between the filter and the audio out, and you get a high passed version (if the filter is set to LP). If you keep the connection between the filter and audio out, and instead add a connection between -X.out to audio out, you should get total cancellation."
Statistics: Posted by beatniks3 — 10 Jul 2009, 15:26
]]>2009-07-10T02:32:14+02:002009-07-10T02:32:14+02:00https://www.brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1648&p=9642#p9642but with carefully hearing I think we can find the best sample setting, then should remain the same if global setup (block executions/cpu speed don't change... but might worth testing sending a little impulse and count elapsed time, will try, but the couting system might have itself process latency... gonna try.
]]>2009-07-10T01:25:08+02:002009-07-10T01:25:08+02:00https://www.brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1648&p=9641#p9641 do you think it would be possible to measure the amount of samples delay you need and then enter that into num samples? how likely is that number to change?
Statistics: Posted by beatniks3 — 10 Jul 2009, 01:25
dry is going to L1, recomposed to L2 of crossfade. here my source is a sampler to replace.
yes the delay is on the dry before summing the inverted LP. in fact you ll need to separate what goes to L2, one is the LP direct out from LP, the two other wires compose HP.
]]>2009-07-09T23:55:19+02:002009-07-09T23:55:19+02:00https://www.brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1648&p=9639#p9639 so i can just use a delay module on the wire between dry and audio out?
Statistics: Posted by beatniks3 — 09 Jul 2009, 23:55
from first test this seems a way to make a phase inverter, have not total cancelation but quasi, seems to give good results with usine filters.. have to put a delay of a few samples on the dry signal before summing with inverted phase from LP to compensate processing latency (here about 17samples), but results seems good, crossfading between dry and recomposed HPLP gives a quite transparent result (i tried Q at 0,5 crossFreq around 1k)
]]>2009-07-09T23:08:12+02:002009-07-09T23:08:12+02:00https://www.brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1648&p=9637#p9637Statistics: Posted by beatniks3 — 09 Jul 2009, 23:08
]]>2009-07-09T22:34:58+02:002009-07-09T22:34:58+02:00https://www.brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1648&p=9635#p9635think need to find a good 3rd party vst plugin for filter and phase inverter...there might exist some direct crossover as well...im interested too so i ll return results if i find a good setup... but im sure it works, tested on ableton, the phase trick is working.
]]>2009-07-09T22:24:33+02:002009-07-09T22:24:33+02:00https://www.brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1648&p=9634#p9634 that's what i was thinking about why this deley phase invert method isn't working (processing time)
i would try the 1-input or similiar but i'm not sure how to relate phase to either db or 0 to 1, seems like if you did 1- either of those you would dealing with vol.
Statistics: Posted by beatniks3 — 09 Jul 2009, 22:24
]]>2009-07-09T18:56:17+02:002009-07-09T18:56:17+02:00https://www.brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1648&p=9632#p9632Statistics: Posted by beatniks3 — 09 Jul 2009, 18:56
]]>2009-07-09T18:36:31+02:002009-07-09T18:36:31+02:00https://www.brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1648&p=9631#p9631Statistics: Posted by 23fx23 — 09 Jul 2009, 18:36
]]>2009-07-09T15:22:06+02:002009-07-09T15:22:06+02:00https://www.brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1648&p=9622#p9622 here is my progress so far but it doesn't seem to be working, any ideas?
edit i should say i'm just doing the left channel for now just to test
Statistics: Posted by beatniks3 — 09 Jul 2009, 15:22