Statistics: Posted by artificial — 24 Jan 2012, 16:26
]]>
Statistics: Posted by nay-seven — 24 Jan 2012, 11:28
]]>
for a 4*4 you can achieve that by module
but mixing that with the exclu patch is tricky, because your click infos aren't flipped...
here is a try :
but the exclu is valid only by clicking on the left matrix, and the right one is just graphic infos result
hope it help
Statistics: Posted by martignasse — 24 Jan 2012, 11:11
]]>
well it would just need the graphical representation to be flipped...
i got a 4x4 matrix and i managed to get the result by using 4 "get row" modules ... so far this worked great, but I also need "exculsive mode (cells)" to work with the 4 "get row" modules! until now, i was not able to get it working rightly...
i'm going to have a look at the swap array module, thanks for the suggestion!
Statistics: Posted by artificial — 24 Jan 2012, 10:29
]]>
unfortunatly, there is no easy way to achieve that...
script is your friend for this type of task.
is it only the graphical representation you want flipped or the array data too ?
[edit] the swap array module turn it from 180 deg, making the 'new' 0 index in down right cell
Statistics: Posted by martignasse — 24 Jan 2012, 08:51
]]>
just a short question: is it possible to flip the order of the rows? this way index 0 would be the bottom left cell of the grid...
thanks in advance!
Statistics: Posted by artificial — 23 Jan 2012, 23:05
]]>
Statistics: Posted by 23fx23 — 23 Jan 2012, 21:44
]]>
i noticed a small thing: the reset value doesn't seem effective. here i can enter 1 or 0, nothing will change when pressing reset.
yop, good catch it's a regression bug :rolleyes:
will be fixed in the next release
thanks
Statistics: Posted by martignasse — 23 Jan 2012, 20:55
]]>
]]>
when i put a patch with a matrix on the time line of the sequencer it doesn't memorize the contain of the cells.
could you have a look on that ?
thank
Statistics: Posted by joffo78 — 18 Jun 2011, 15:42
]]>
so i'll see that with him, hope i'll can achieve that
Statistics: Posted by martignasse — 17 Jun 2011, 14:11
]]>
]]>
what do you mean by
?Senso did it in the next version with xy pad
is this behaviour (fade time on the XYpad) exist in the 5.50.58 or is it for the next version ?
Statistics: Posted by martignasse — 16 Jun 2011, 10:55
]]>
i cant answer for now, i have things to check before.
i'll feedback soon.
Statistics: Posted by martignasse — 15 Jun 2011, 21:42
]]>
Senso did it in the next version with xy pad and it would be fantastic to do the same with matrix .
Statistics: Posted by joffo78 — 14 Jun 2011, 08:30
]]>
oups, long time ago :
ethnix73 wrote:
not easy to solve, maybe by implementing these mode internally in the module.
It would be really great!ethnix73 wrote:
yep, i know, the problem is at script level. as it is based on the last clicked cell, it's not working very well with the data provided by the preset manager.I don't know if it's script or matrix module related, but the exclu mode is not compatible with a preset manager martignasse....
not easy to solve, maybe by implementing these mode internally in the module.
Statistics: Posted by ethnix73 — 19 Mar 2011, 02:24
]]>
cheers martinStatistics: Posted by 23fx23 — 15 Mar 2011, 23:45
]]>
any news on the perf/ multitouch update ?
well, it's coming....slowly as i'm busy with other things too. but it's coming ?Statistics: Posted by martignasse — 15 Mar 2011, 23:39
]]>
i know for the shift function, but on a touch screen .....hmm
yep, simple like thatwhy can't you create a layout value? Then could be adjustable by the user?
it's on my todo list now
Statistics: Posted by martignasse — 15 Mar 2011, 23:36
]]>
this constant isn't exposed to the user, thus not modifiable, but you have a shit mode where you can multiply it from 1 to 10 (in edit layout) , so, up to 500 pixel.
why can't you create a layout value? Then could be adjustable by the user?Statistics: Posted by senso — 15 Mar 2011, 22:47
]]>
Statistics: Posted by nay-seven — 15 Mar 2011, 22:29
]]>
Statistics: Posted by 23fx23 — 15 Mar 2011, 22:17
]]>
]]>
Thank you for your answer but i afraid it's a little bit to complicated for me (you patch examples are very complex).
May i ask you some questions in french forum ?
thanks
jof
Statistics: Posted by joffo78 — 15 Mar 2011, 19:43
]]>
_is there a way to add precision to the array values( here the last array to dispatch values can't reflect the precision chosen in the options)
well, absolutely not possible. precision(nb of decimal digit) in usine is only a graphic thing. behind, values are always plain float.
the matrix and the array module (like you noticed) always deal with plain float values.
but maybe you want some sort of snapping, witch is different.
in fader mode, the drag to change a cell value is a linear function, but not based on the cell height, it's a constant of 50. that is, 50 pixel to go from min value to max value._it's seems that the precision ( this time when you change the value ) is not the same on all the height of the cells
this constant isn't exposed to the user, thus not modifiable, but you have a shit mode where you can multiply it from 1 to 10 (in edit layout) , so, up to 500 pixel.
Statistics: Posted by martignasse — 15 Mar 2011, 17:04
]]>