ArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArray
BrainModularBrainModular Users Forum2017-12-30T13:45:39+02:00https://www.brainmodular.com/forums/app.php/feed/topic/59802017-12-30T13:45:39+02:002017-12-30T13:45:39+02:00https://www.brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=5980&p=38885#p38885- output modules are not processed which means that they have no impact on the CPU load. To apply the "pass if change" option we need to process modules and verify that they have not changed during the last calculation cycle. In other word, this option will have a deep impact on overall performances. For now, I don't have solution but I'm still thinking about it.
]]>2017-12-09T22:27:49+02:002017-12-09T22:27:49+02:00https://www.brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=5980&p=38721#p38721discuss many time with senso, but I can't remember the reason why he doesn't use this idea
Statistics: Posted by SylvainT — 09 Dec 2017, 21:27
]]>2017-12-04T04:49:32+02:002017-12-04T04:49:32+02:00https://www.brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=5980&p=38674#p38674Statistics: Posted by CREDO — 04 Dec 2017, 03:49
]]>
2017-11-19T23:51:26+02:002017-11-19T23:51:26+02:00https://www.brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=5980&p=38569#p38569Statistics: Posted by damstraversaz — 19 Nov 2017, 22:51
]]>2017-11-18T18:04:07+02:002017-11-18T18:04:07+02:00https://www.brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=5980&p=38565#p38565Statistics: Posted by x.iso — 18 Nov 2017, 17:04
]]>2017-11-18T17:37:32+02:002017-11-18T17:37:32+02:00https://www.brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=5980&p=38564#p38564I think it would be beneficial for the inputs/outputs to have a checkbox and internal pass if changed.
In the future I think this should be added as an internal option to many modules.
-s
Statistics: Posted by sephult — 18 Nov 2017, 16:37
]]>BrainModularBrainModular Users Forum2017-12-30T13:45:39+02:00https://www.brainmodular.com/forums/app.php/feed/topic/59802017-12-30T13:45:39+02:002017-12-30T13:45:39+02:00https://www.brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=5980&p=38885#p38885- output modules are not processed which means that they have no impact on the CPU load. To apply the "pass if change" option we need to process modules and verify that they have not changed during the last calculation cycle. In other word, this option will have a deep impact on overall performances. For now, I don't have solution but I'm still thinking about it.
]]>2017-12-09T22:27:49+02:002017-12-09T22:27:49+02:00https://www.brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=5980&p=38721#p38721discuss many time with senso, but I can't remember the reason why he doesn't use this idea
Statistics: Posted by SylvainT — 09 Dec 2017, 21:27
]]>2017-12-04T04:49:32+02:002017-12-04T04:49:32+02:00https://www.brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=5980&p=38674#p38674Statistics: Posted by CREDO — 04 Dec 2017, 03:49
]]>2017-11-19T23:51:26+02:002017-11-19T23:51:26+02:00https://www.brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=5980&p=38569#p38569Statistics: Posted by damstraversaz — 19 Nov 2017, 22:51
]]>2017-11-18T18:04:07+02:002017-11-18T18:04:07+02:00https://www.brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=5980&p=38565#p38565Statistics: Posted by x.iso — 18 Nov 2017, 17:04
]]>2017-11-18T17:37:32+02:002017-11-18T17:37:32+02:00https://www.brainmodular.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=5980&p=38564#p38564I think it would be beneficial for the inputs/outputs to have a checkbox and internal pass if changed.
In the future I think this should be added as an internal option to many modules.
-s
Statistics: Posted by sephult — 18 Nov 2017, 16:37