surround panner
the maximum area is not enough when using 4 speakers, the speakers area should be recovering each over quite a lot to avoid "holes" in the diffusion
cheers
olivar
cheers
olivar
http://oli-lab.org
Win11 Ryzen9/32GB RAM - RME MADIFACE - SSL alpha link 4-16 - OSC capable interfaces
follow OLI_LAB adventures on Mastodon
@olivar_premier@mastodon.social
Win11 Ryzen9/32GB RAM - RME MADIFACE - SSL alpha link 4-16 - OSC capable interfaces
follow OLI_LAB adventures on Mastodon
@olivar_premier@mastodon.social
-
jean-marc duchenne
- Member
- Posts: 86
- Location: St Etienne - France
- Contact:
They do recover, just don't trust the view !
Actually, the size of the dots area is not at all representative of the real area, it only makes hearing and control difficult
A better representation would be either NO view at all (only the value), or, of course, an accurate view...
Actually, the size of the dots area is not at all representative of the real area, it only makes hearing and control difficult
A better representation would be either NO view at all (only the value), or, of course, an accurate view...
Thank you Jean Marc !
that's what I noticed now that I experimented in depth with the surround panner !
Still I'd like to be able to have a control over the speaker position.
I did quite a lot of experimements with the quadratic distance module (that allows the speakers position to be controlled) the goal being to have the space dimension of music becoming as expressive as possible in realtime !
Didnt know you were a Holyhock user : great !
that's what I noticed now that I experimented in depth with the surround panner !
Still I'd like to be able to have a control over the speaker position.
I did quite a lot of experimements with the quadratic distance module (that allows the speakers position to be controlled) the goal being to have the space dimension of music becoming as expressive as possible in realtime !
Didnt know you were a Holyhock user : great !
http://oli-lab.org
Win11 Ryzen9/32GB RAM - RME MADIFACE - SSL alpha link 4-16 - OSC capable interfaces
follow OLI_LAB adventures on Mastodon
@olivar_premier@mastodon.social
Win11 Ryzen9/32GB RAM - RME MADIFACE - SSL alpha link 4-16 - OSC capable interfaces
follow OLI_LAB adventures on Mastodon
@olivar_premier@mastodon.social
-
jean-marc duchenne
- Member
- Posts: 86
- Location: St Etienne - France
- Contact:
I am not really a user, more a "follower", since I don't play live music (and when I do a little, I finally use things simpler than Usine...).
But I will be happy to see improvements on the surround panner. It will be good for Usiners.
But I will be happy to see improvements on the surround panner. It will be good for Usiners.
unfortunately, the size of speakers doesn't fit to field area.
In the latest version, it's half smaller.
It's choice because I realize that with big speakers it was hard to change their positions with an acceptable precision.
In the latest version, it's half smaller.
It's choice because I realize that with big speakers it was hard to change their positions with an acceptable precision.
Olivier Sens
www.brainmodular.com
www.brainmodular.com
OK, it-s working fine for me now !
http://oli-lab.org
Win11 Ryzen9/32GB RAM - RME MADIFACE - SSL alpha link 4-16 - OSC capable interfaces
follow OLI_LAB adventures on Mastodon
@olivar_premier@mastodon.social
Win11 Ryzen9/32GB RAM - RME MADIFACE - SSL alpha link 4-16 - OSC capable interfaces
follow OLI_LAB adventures on Mastodon
@olivar_premier@mastodon.social
-
jean-marc duchenne
- Member
- Posts: 86
- Location: St Etienne - France
- Contact:
Perhaps could you (we) add a simple button switch to show/hide the field area ?
It is not always usefull to see it, and whatever its size, can be very confusing with a high number of speakers.
It could by hidden when positionning the speakers and shown if we need to set the area parameter ?
So it could have the right size and be an aid when setting the area ?
It is not always usefull to see it, and whatever its size, can be very confusing with a high number of speakers.
It could by hidden when positionning the speakers and shown if we need to set the area parameter ?
So it could have the right size and be an aid when setting the area ?
HI !
Thats a good idea Jean Marc . I implemented a switch that multiplies with the desired area value.
works fine but the speaker location should be locked otherwise the speaker position resets as you operate the switch...
Thats a good idea Jean Marc . I implemented a switch that multiplies with the desired area value.
works fine but the speaker location should be locked otherwise the speaker position resets as you operate the switch...
http://oli-lab.org
Win11 Ryzen9/32GB RAM - RME MADIFACE - SSL alpha link 4-16 - OSC capable interfaces
follow OLI_LAB adventures on Mastodon
@olivar_premier@mastodon.social
Win11 Ryzen9/32GB RAM - RME MADIFACE - SSL alpha link 4-16 - OSC capable interfaces
follow OLI_LAB adventures on Mastodon
@olivar_premier@mastodon.social
if we could control the speaker position with two arrays (one for X, one for Y coordinates)
Why ?
- because I'm using different speaker configuration and for now I need one patch for each config. with those arrays I could set different speaker config from one patch.
- because I could set speaker angle more efficently than by hand
- because I'm planning to have moving speakers !
Why ?
- because I'm using different speaker configuration and for now I need one patch for each config. with those arrays I could set different speaker config from one patch.
- because I could set speaker angle more efficently than by hand
- because I'm planning to have moving speakers !
http://oli-lab.org
Win11 Ryzen9/32GB RAM - RME MADIFACE - SSL alpha link 4-16 - OSC capable interfaces
follow OLI_LAB adventures on Mastodon
@olivar_premier@mastodon.social
Win11 Ryzen9/32GB RAM - RME MADIFACE - SSL alpha link 4-16 - OSC capable interfaces
follow OLI_LAB adventures on Mastodon
@olivar_premier@mastodon.social
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests
