I find myself doing subpatches and almost always have to put a pass if changed on the In/Out.
I think it would be beneficial for the inputs/outputs to have a checkbox and internal pass if changed.
In the future I think this should be added as an internal option to many modules.
-s
Data In/Out and Others
+1
join Hollyhock Usine Discord server: https://discord.gg/EdJarnE
-
damstraversaz
- Member
- Posts: 159
- Location: Chambéry
- Contact:
Yes , it could be very useful.
yes +1
discuss many time with senso, but I can't remember the reason why he doesn't use this idea
discuss many time with senso, but I can't remember the reason why he doesn't use this idea
the reasons are simple:
- output modules are not processed which means that they have no impact on the CPU load. To apply the "pass if change" option we need to process modules and verify that they have not changed during the last calculation cycle.
In other word, this option will have a deep impact on overall performances.
For now, I don't have solution but I'm still thinking about it.
- output modules are not processed which means that they have no impact on the CPU load. To apply the "pass if change" option we need to process modules and verify that they have not changed during the last calculation cycle.
In other word, this option will have a deep impact on overall performances.
For now, I don't have solution but I'm still thinking about it.
Olivier Sens
www.brainmodular.com
www.brainmodular.com
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests
