Array - 512 is too small

[nelson]

Hi,

why array can have only 512 elements? please, do small revolution in this usine should be soft without limits (such a low limits

[amiga909]

Hi,

why array can have only 512 elements? please, do small revolution in this usine should be soft without limits (such a low limits

where? what?

(code example please)

[nelson]

I mean Array module in Usine - in code also - max numer of elements is 512.

[bsork]

You can create larger arrays within scripts, and I'm fairly certain that you can do that in user modules as well.

As Amiga909 ask: Do you have an example? Not necessarily a code example, but a description of what you want to achieve.

[nelson]

what i want to achieve:

I wrote my own user module that generate long sequence of values. Its implementation of L-system that return array of values - I'm using it as midi code1 values. L-systems generates sometimes very long streams of values - yes, I can partition it, or send midi values directly from user module, but in this case its nessesery to have it in array outside user module (on array out) so I need to have more than 1 and partition it...
Its in fact not a big problem in implementation but ... not optimal because of unnatural limit of Array module.

[senso]

I imagine that 512 can be too small in some situations.
I'm thinking about a way to adjust, and increase, this limit in the setup.

[LevraiBernardo]

Being able to increase this upper limit in arrays indexes would be great, but in some situations, changing downer limit can be interesting too. (I mean index start at 0, but in some cases, starting at 1 would fit better). Could we imagine a starting and an ending values for "dynamic range arrays" ?

[woodslanding]

bump.... any more word on this?